Appellate.net

 
home
about the group
appellate attorneys
briefs
docket reports
articles & treatises
oral arguments
news
appellate courts
search
contact

Mayer Brown In The News - Archive
 
HTML DocumentFifth Circuit Overturns NLRB’s Anti-Arbitration D.R. Horton Ruling
We have frequently chronicled the ongoing efforts of the plaintiffs’ bar to circumvent the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, which held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) requires the enforcement of parties’ agreements to resolve their disputes through individual arbitration rather than class or collective proceedings. Read >>
HTML DocumentSupreme Court Confronts 'Forum Fights' in Business Disputes
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Michele Odorizzi (Chicago) is quoted in an article reporting on the US Supreme Court decision in Atlantic Marine Construction Company, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Western District of Texas et alRead >>
HTML DocumentForum Selection Clauses To Be Enforced, High Court Says
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Michele Odorizzi (Chicago) is quoted in an article reporting on the US Supreme Court decision in Atlantic Marine Construction Company, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Western District of Texas et alRead >>
HTML DocumentTypically Quiet, Justices Open Up About Denials
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Steve Shapiro (Chicago) is quoted on the increase in nondecision opinions issued in the US Supreme Court this term. Read >>
HTML DocumentRegulatory Climate is Unsettled
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) is quoted from a panel discussion held at the National Law Journal Regulatory Summit. Read >>
HTML Document9th Circuit speaks (twice) on arbitration agreements
In a bylined article, Litigation & Dispute Resolution partners Andy Pincus and Archis Parasharami (both Washington, DC) examine how two recent decisions in the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit underscore key points for the enforceability of arbitration agreements in California. Read >>
HTML DocumentPanel: Supreme Court has Potential to Reshape Agency Authority
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) is quoted from a panel discussion at the National Law Journal Regulatory Summit about the US Supreme Court’s regulatory docket. Read >>
HTML DocumentWith Appeal Pending, Gloves Come Off in Pharmaceutical Feud
The article reports that Litigation & Dispute Resolution partners Don Falk (Palo Alto) and Evan Tager (Washington, DC) will argue on behalf of Actelion Ltd. in a pharmaceutical case before the California Court of Appeal for the First District. Read >>
HTML DocumentSupreme Court Denies Review—This Time—Of Challenge To Cy Pres Class Settlement
For weeks, class-action practitioners have been waiting to see whether the Supreme Court would grant review in Marek v. Lane, a case involving a challenge to the cy pres component of the class settlement of the Facebook “Beacon” litigation. Read >>
HTML DocumentWill California Strike Again? The Latest Word From the California Supreme Court On Enforcing Arbitration Agreements
The California Supreme Court has a long history of inventing new rules—either from common law or as “glosses” on statutes—to invalidate arbitration agreements entered into by consumers and employees. Read >>
HTML Document9th Circ. Removes Calif. Barrier To Arbitration Enforcement
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Archis Parasharami (Washington, DC) is quoted on the case Kevin Ferguson et al. v. Corinthian Colleges Inc. et al. in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Read >>
HTML DocumentJustices Wrestle With Question: Why Is Daimler Human Rights Case In California?
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) is quoted on the US Supreme Court case Daimler AG v. BowmanRead >>
HTML DocumentSupreme Court Has Deep Docket in Its New Term
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) is quoted on the cases on the docket in the upcoming US Supreme Court term. Read >>
HTML DocumentPrecedents on the Line in New Term
The Roberts Court will confront pleas to reconsider or overrule a number of key decisions undergirding hot-button issues on the new term's docket. Read >>
HTML DocumentSupreme Court Downshifts Into New Term But Past Earthshakers Still Fueling Caseload
Litigation & Dispute Resolution special counsel Charles Rothfeld (Washington, DC) is quoted on the upcoming term in the US Supreme Court. Read >>
HTML DocumentD.C. Circuit Overturns Certification of Antitrust Class Action and Requires Reconsideration in Light of Comcast Corp. v. Behrend
Class-action lawyers on both sides of the “v.” have been debating the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend. Read >>
HTML DocumentJust How Business-Friendly is the Supreme Court, Anyhow?
The U.S. Supreme Court term just ended was good for business—but not, percentage-wise, as good as you might think. Read >>
HTML DocumentAssociates in Appellate Court
Litigation & Dispute Resolution associates Richard Caldarone and Brian Netter (both Washington, DC) are profiled in a feature on their federal appellate court experience. Read >>
HTML Document2013’s Big Enviro Decisions Tip In Favor Of Private Sector
Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Tim Bishop (Chicago) is quoted on the US Supreme Court ruling that overturned a Ninth Circuit decision ruling that stormwater runoff from logging roads required a Clean Water Act permit. Read >>
HTML DocumentA Fractious, and Fractured, Term at the Supreme Court
It was a U.S. Supreme Court term for the history books, with a final week that will be remembered for its powerful — and to some, contradictory — rulings on equality. Read >>
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
   next page >>   view all >>
[ Back to news page ]


 
 
© 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved. --  Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.