home
about the group
appellate attorneys
briefs
docket reports
articles & treatises
oral arguments
news
appellate courts
search
contact
 

SUPREME COURT DOCKET REPORT

Mayer Brown's Supreme Court and Appellate Practice Group distributes a Docket Report whenever the Supreme Court grants certiorari in a case of interest to the business community. We also email the Docket Report to our subscribed members and if you don't already subscribe to the Docket Report and would like to, please click here.

October Term 2008 - January 26, 2009

The Supreme Court granted certiorari today in one case of interest to the business community:


Interlocutory Appeal—Claims of Attorney-Client Privilege

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, an appellate court has jurisdiction to review only "final decisions" of the district court. Discovery orders generally are not considered final orders for purposes of obtaining appellate jurisdiction; therefore, they usually are not immediately appealable. Nevertheless, the collateral order doctrine, established by the Supreme Court in Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546 (1949), provides an exception to section 1291's finality requirement where an order conclusively determines the disputed question, resolves an important issue separate from the merits of the action, and is effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment. Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter (08-678) to decide whether, under Cohen, an appellate court has jurisdiction over the immediate appeal of an order compelling disclosure of information claimed to be protected by the attorney-client privilege.

The Court's resolution of the question, which has divided the lower courts, will clarify the scope of the collateral order doctrine.

In this case, the Eleventh Circuit held that it lacked jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal of an order compelling disclosure of certain arguably privileged attorney-client communications because the district court's order could be effectively reviewed on an appeal from a final judgment. 541 F.3d 1048, 1053. Its holding put it in conflict with a number of other circuits, which have held that the collateral order doctrine permits immediate appeals of discovery orders implicating the attorney-client privilege.

Absent an extension, amicus briefs in support of the petitioner are due March 19, and amicus briefs in support of the respondent are due April 20. Any questions about this case should be directed to Dan Himmelfarb (+1 202 263-3035) in our Washington, DC office.


The general editor of the Docket Report is Andrew Tauber in our Washington, DC office, who can be reached at atauber@mayerbrown.com or +1 202 263 3324.

Mayer Brown Supreme Court Docket Reports provide information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest to our clients and friends. They are not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and are not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed.

 
 
© 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved. --  Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.