home
about the group
appellate attorneys
briefs
docket reports
articles & treatises
oral arguments
news
appellate courts
search
contact
 

Supreme Court Decision Alerts - 2007 Term
 

  • June 26, 2008
    • Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. v. Public Util. Dist. No. 1, Nos. 06-1457 & 06-1462

  • June 25, 2008
    • Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, No. 07-219
  • June 23, 2008
    • Sprint Communications Co., L.P. v. APCC Services, Inc., No. 07-552

  • June 19, 2008
    • ERISA—Plan Administrators and "Structural" Conflicts of Interest
    • Labor Law—Federal Preemption—Preemption of State Law Prohibiting Use of State Funds by Private Employers in Union Organizing Campaigns
    • Employment Law—Age Discrimination In Employment Act—Burden of Persuasion
    • Employment Discrimination—Age Discrimination in Employment Act—Facial Discrimination and Inference of Discriminatory Intent
     
  • June 16, 2008
    • Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc., No. 07-312

  • June 12, 2008
    • Republic of Philippines et al. v. Pimentel, No. 06-1204

  • June 9, 2008
    • Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., No. 06-937
    • Allison Engine Co., Inc. v. United States ex rel. Sanders, No. 07-214
    • Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co., No. 07-210

  • May 27, 2008
    • CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries, No. 06-1431

  • May 19, 2008
    • Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis, No. 06-666

  • April 15, 2008
    • United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co., No. 07-308
    • Meadwestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue, No. 06-1413


  • March 25, 2008
    • Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., No. 06-989

  • March 3, 2008
    • Boulware v. United States, No. 06-1509 (Internal Revenue Code--Return of Capital Rule)
  • February 27, 2008
    • Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki, No. 06-1322 (Age Discrimination--Requirement of an EEOC Charge--Intake Questionnaire)
  • February 26, 2008
    • Sprint/United Mgmt. Co. v. Mendelsohn, No. 06-1221 (Employment Discrimination--Evidence--Nonparty Testimony of Discrimination)
  • February 20, 2008
    • Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., No. 06-179 (Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act--Medical Device Amendments--Federal Preemption)
    • Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Association, No. 06-457 (FAA Authorization Act--Regulation of Motor and Air Carriers--Preemption of State Law) 
    • Preston v. Ferrer, No. 06-1463 (Federal Arbitration Act--Preemption of State-Law Administrative Exhaustion Requirement)
    • LaRue v. De Wolff, Boberg & Assocs., No. 06-856 (ERISA--Scope of Civil Enforcement Actions) 

  • January 22, 2008
    • The Supreme Court Denies Review in Enron Despite Plaintiffs' Assertion That There Is a "Financial Services" Exception to Stoneridge's Limit on Third Party Liability.
  • January 16, 2008
    • Knight v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, No. 06-1286 (Taxation--Trusts)

  • January 15, 2008
    • Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., No. 06-43 (Securities Fraud--Third-Party Liability)

  • January 8, 2008
    • John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States, No. 06-1164 (federal claims)
  • December 4, 2007
    • CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Georgia State Board of Equalization, No. 06-1287 (Taxation)

Mayer Brown Supreme Court Docket Reports provide information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest to our clients and friends. They are not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and are not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed.



 
 
© 2013. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved. --  Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.