home
about the group
appellate attorneys
briefs
docket reports
oral arguments
news on
 mayerbrown.com
contact
 
Profile
Experience
Article(s) Written:
In the News

Selected sample of appellate briefs authored


Adelson v. Hananel, 510 F.3d 43 (1st Cir. 2007)

Appellant's Brief
Appellant / Cross-Appellee's Response & Reply Brief

Apple Corps Limited et al. v. Capitol Records, Inc. and EMI Records Limited, No. 604385/05 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't) (settled)

Appellant's Opening Brief

Ballard v. Commissioner, 544 U.S. 40 (2005)

Brief for the Petitioners
Reply Brief for Petitioners

BCE, Inc. v. Teleglobe Commc'ns Corp., 493 F.3d 345 (3d Cir. 2007)

Appellee's Brief

Bluebird Partners, L.P. v. First Fidelity Bank, N.A., New Jersey, No. 601365/97 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't) (settled)

Brief for Cross Appellant
Reply Brief for Cross Appellant
Brief for Defendant-Appellant
Reply Brief for Defendant-Appellant

Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2008)

Amicus Brief in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari
Brief Amicus Curiae of Retired Military Officers in Support of Petitioners

Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. v. New York Times Co., 130 S. Ct. 350 (2009) (Mem.)

Application to Extend Stay
Reply In Support of Application to Extend Stay

Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. v. New York Times Co., 130 S. Ct. 500 (2009) (Mem.)

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari

Capitol Records, Inc. v. Naxos of America, Inc., 4 N.Y.3d 540 (2005)

Brief for Appellant
Reply Brief

Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v. America Movil, S.A.B. de C.V., 76 A.D.3d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Brief for Defendants-Appellants
Reply Brief for Defendants-Appellants

Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v. America Movil, S.A.B. de C.V., 952 N.E.2d 995 (N.Y. 2011)

Brief for Defendants-Respondents

Estate of Kanter v. Commissioner, 544 U.S. 40 (2005)

Brief for the Petitioners
Reply Brief for Petitioners

Ford v. Garcia , 537 U.S. 1147 (2003)

Petition for certiorari

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004)

Amicus Brief

Hiibel v. The Sixth Judicial Dist. Ct. of the State of Nev., 125 S. Ct. 18 (2005)

Amicus Brief

Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. NLRB, 253 F.3d 119 (D.C. Cir. 2001)

Petitioner's Brief
Petitioner's Reply
Intervenor's Brief

Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997)

Amicus Brief

Lane v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 993 P.2d 388 (Cal.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 928 (2000)

Amicus Brief

Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37 (1996)

Amicus Brief

Odah v. United States , 124 S. Ct. 2686 (2004)

Amicus Brief in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari

Pludeman v. N. Leasing Systems Inc., 890 N.E.2d 184 (N.Y. 2008)

Amicus Brief

Rackson v. Sosin, 14 F. App'x. 23 (2d Cir. 2001)

Brief for Defendant-Appellant
Reply Brief

Sperry v. Crompton Corp., 810 N.Y.S.2d 498 (App. Div.-2d 2006)

Amicus Brief

STMicroelectronics, N.V. v. Credit Suisse Sec. (USA) LLC, 648 F.3d 68 (2d Cir. 2011)

Appellant's Brief
Appellant's Reply Brief

Wyeth v. Coffey, 2007 WL 1793773 (Tex. App.-Beaumont June 21, 2007)

Brief for Appellant
Reply Brief for Appellant
 
 
 
© 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved. --  Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.